Skip to content

Occasional Painting – El Coloso (The Colossus)

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Wise choice, AJ, for having the Colossus turned away from the audience.

Title: El Coloso (The Colossus)

Oil on Linen

Size: 115cm x 105 cm

Museo del Prado (Madrid, Spain)

When is a Goya not a Goya? When one art historian says it isn’t, apparently.

While there has been debate over who painted the famous work for a few years now, a new study, which is being endorsed by Manuela Mena Marqués, head of 18th century art at Prado, claims that while the work is certainly ‘Goya-esque’, it was probably painted not by the master, but by one of his students, Asensio Juliá, who assisted Goya on his frescos for the San Antonio de la Florida church in Madrid. The initals A. J. can be seen in a corner of the painting, which would seem to indicate that a person with the initials A. J. painted it. Although some art historians believe that the initials could simply represent previous owners of the work.

Of course this will now mean that the painting will be viewed as a ‘lesser’ work — indeed, the study indicates that the painting employs a “poverty of the technique, light and colours.” Harsh words, indeed.

No longer a Goya, El Coloso has been stripped of its masterpiece status, at least for some. But I’m sure the debate won’t end here; the new study will be scrutinized closely, and those art historians who disagree will pick it apart like vultures, and defend the work as a Goya until some new piece of evidence is discovered.

So now we have a situation that throws the sometimes absurdity of the art world into striking relief. Some believe El Coloso to be a Goya, and therefore a masterpiece, others believe it to be in the style of Goya, therefore a good painting, but not a great one. Who decides whether a painting is great? Even if Asensio Juliá did paint it, should that change the value of it, both artistically and monetarily?

I for one think it would be cool to have a masterpiece painted by someone named AJ. But that’s just me, and I’m clearly not an art historian, I just (sometimes) blog about them.tniapcco

3 Comments leave one →
  1. SarahP permalink
    Wednesday, February 4, 2009 3:55 pm

    The real question is, are you allowed to dislike it regardless of the painter?

  2. James17930 permalink
    Wednesday, February 18, 2009 2:07 am

    It looks like a movie poster.

  3. Frenchie permalink
    Tuesday, March 3, 2009 1:04 am

    I have so much to say about this I don’t even know where to start. The pretentiousness of the art world has always amazed and infuriated me. I had a conversation about art recently with the owner of an art gallery while in Warsaw. We debated over the credentials of art. I believe that art is to be truly valued by whoever is looking at it, whatever is beautiful or ugly or art, or all of the above to me, might be nothing to you. If a piece of art truly speaks and touches the common man, but an art critic does not see any value in it, does that not mean it is not art? I believe everything can be art, even if I might not get it…or think it’s just a pretentious piece of crap.

    Anyway, I was told that my opinion is completely wrong and that I have an amateur point of view…because I have not studied art.

    So, apparently, your opinion on art does not matter unless, others who have a published opinion agree with you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: